{
  "@context": "https://agentflare.org/schema",
  "type": "SocialMediaPosting",
  "tier": "L2-full",
  "title": "Brian Krassenstein on Silicon Valley: “Here's an UPDATE on the Silicon Valley Bank Collapse: - $175…”",
  "description": "Here's an UPDATE on the Silicon Valley Bank Collapse: - $175 billion of customer deposits are now under the control of t… — 3.0K likes, 600 reposts on X.",
  "canonical": "https://agentflare.org/social/silicon-valley/heres-an-update-on-the-silicon-valley-324416.html",
  "category": "social",
  "updated": "2026-10-16",
  "generated_at": "2026-10-16T00:37:01.652Z",
  "facts": [
    {
      "label": "Author",
      "value": "@krassenstein"
    },
    {
      "label": "Verified",
      "value": "Yes"
    },
    {
      "label": "Rank today",
      "value": "#6 of 14"
    },
    {
      "label": "Posted",
      "value": "2023-03-11 12:41 UTC"
    }
  ],
  "data": {
    "theme": "silicon-valley",
    "tweet": {
      "id": "1634535091547324416",
      "url": "https://x.com/krassenstein/status/1634535091547324416",
      "text": "Here's an UPDATE on the Silicon Valley Bank Collapse: - $175 billion of customer deposits are now under the control of the FDIC. - The contagion has impacted the USDC stable coin price, as USDC kept $3.3B of its $40B of reserves at SVB - USDC prices have become unpegged from the USD, dropping as low as $0.88 at one point. - This is the second largest bank collapse in US history, based on assets - The FDIC has created a new bank, the National Bank of Santa Clara, which will now hold all the assets of SVB. - As of the end of 2022, 97.3% of deposits at SVB were NOT FDIC Insured - The primary losers in all of this will be tech companies and startups as well as venture capital firms. - Despite people like Tucker Carlson claiming SVB failed because of \"wokeness\", SVP actually failed because they over-invested in US Treasury bonds. When the FED raised rates, these investments dropped in value. When people started to pull their money suddenly, they couldn't handle the bank-run.",
      "author": "krassenstein",
      "authorName": "Brian Krassenstein",
      "followers": 1000274,
      "verified": true,
      "likes": 2989,
      "retweets": 600,
      "replies": 408,
      "quotes": 66,
      "views": 1407446,
      "createdAt": "Sat Mar 11 12:41:48 +0000 2023",
      "lang": "en"
    },
    "rank": 6,
    "conversation": {
      "title": "Silicon Valley Bank returns as a reference point",
      "summary": "@krassenstein posted a 2023 update saying 175 billion dollars of SVB deposits were under FDIC control, USDC dropped as low as 0.88 dollars, and 97.3% of deposits were not FDIC insured. The post says SVB failed over Treasury bond investments (3.0K likes). @BullTheoryio says bank stocks are falling globally, the 10 year yield is above 5.2%, and investors fear a repeat of SVB (2.2K likes).",
      "why": "A 2023 collapse is being used by @BullTheoryio as a template for current bank-stock worries.",
      "posts": [
        "P6",
        "P8"
      ]
    }
  },
  "analysis_md": "Here's an UPDATE on the Silicon Valley Bank Collapse: - $175 billion of customer deposits are now under the control of the FDIC. - The contagion has impacted the USDC stable coin price, as USDC kept $3.3B of its $40B of reserves at SVB - USDC prices have become unpegged from the USD, dropping as low as $0.88 at one point. - This is the second largest bank collapse in US history, based on assets - The FDIC has created a new bank, the National Bank of Santa Clara, which will now hold all the assets of SVB. - As of the end of 2022, 97.3% of deposits at SVB were NOT FDIC Insured - The primary losers in all of this will be tech companies and startups as well as venture capital firms. - Despite people like Tucker Carlson claiming SVB failed because of \"wokeness\", SVP actually failed because they over-invested in US Treasury bonds. When the FED raised rates, these investments dropped in value. When people started to pull their money suddenly, they couldn't handle the bank-run.\n\nEngagement: 3.0K likes, 600 reposts, 408 replies, 1.4M views. Author: @krassenstein (verified), 1.0M followers.\n\n## Conversation: Silicon Valley Bank returns as a reference point\n\n@krassenstein posted a 2023 update saying 175 billion dollars of SVB deposits were under FDIC control, USDC dropped as low as 0.88 dollars, and 97.3% of deposits were not FDIC insured. The post says SVB failed over Treasury bond investments (3.0K likes). @BullTheoryio says bank stocks are falling globally, the 10 year yield is above 5.2%, and investors fear a repeat of SVB (2.2K likes).",
  "sources": [
    {
      "title": "@krassenstein on X",
      "url": "https://x.com/krassenstein/status/1634535091547324416"
    },
    {
      "title": "AISA Twitter API",
      "url": "https://aisa.one/docs/api-reference/twitter/get_twitter-tweet-advanced-search"
    }
  ],
  "related": [
    {
      "name": "@bocxtop",
      "url": "https://agentflare.org/social/silicon-valley/silicon-valley-being-exposed-as-greedy-frauds-613976.html"
    },
    {
      "name": "@nypost",
      "url": "https://agentflare.org/social/silicon-valley/thousands-of-iranian-tech-workers-in-silicon-448502.html"
    },
    {
      "name": "@muhammadshehad2",
      "url": "https://agentflare.org/social/silicon-valley/israel-has-turned-gaza-into-an-experimentation-980932.html"
    },
    {
      "name": "@pmarca",
      "url": "https://agentflare.org/social/silicon-valley/overheard-in-silicon-valley-the-transition-from-324649.html"
    },
    {
      "name": "@a16z",
      "url": "https://agentflare.org/social/silicon-valley/optimism-wins-httpstcokbrme7zey2-247212.html"
    }
  ],
  "pricing": {
    "price_usd": 0.005,
    "method": "402",
    "endpoint": "https://esa.aisa.one/api/v1/access/verify",
    "autopay_hint": "set crawlerAutoPrice=true with the X-Crawler-Token header",
    "onboarding": "https://esa.aisa.one/agent/guide.html"
  },
  "powered_by": "AISA — agent-native search, settlement & delivery (https://aisa.one)"
}